K was injured by a car and lied on the walkway bleeding. L passed by and saw K, but he did not stop. Later K died because of bleeding and K’s personal representative sued L. If the court held for K, it would be because

A. L was K’s husband.

B. L was a passer-by.

C. L was a nurse on his way to work.

D. L was a court clerk.

 

【答案与解析】

给TA打赏
共{{data.count}}人
人已打赏
法律英语

In a car accident, G was injured and sued H and J for negligence. The rule of joint and several liability was adopted by the court and the damage of G was determined at $10,000 in total. Suppose the jury found G was 30% liable, while H and J each was 35% liable, which of the following statements is NOT true?

2021-1-23 13:15:43

法律英语

K was injured by a car and lied on the walkway bleeding. L passed by and saw K, but he did not stop. Later K died because of bleeding and K’s personal representative sued L. If the court held for L, it would be because

2022-2-15 9:45:45

0 条回复 A文章作者 M管理员
    暂无讨论,说说你的看法吧
个人中心
购物车
优惠劵
今日签到
有新私信 私信列表
搜索