K was injured by a car and lied on the walkway bleeding. L passed by and saw K, but he did not stop. Later K died because of bleeding and K’s personal representative sued L. If the court held for K, it would be because
In a car accident, G was injured and sued H and J for negligence. The rule of joint and several liability was adopted by the court and the damage of G was determined at $10,000 in total. Suppose the jury found G was 30% liable, while H and J each was 35% liable, which of the following statements is NOT true?
C is an employee of D Co.. One day, when transporting goods for D Co., C negligently hit a pedestrian E. If E sued D Co. and won, the most probable reason would be the following BUT
A bought a car from dealer B and had an accident because of the defect of the car. If A sues B, what would be the most likely result?
A common law doctrine providing that an acceptance made in response to an offer is valid and forms a binding contract at the time of its dispatch, as when it is placed in the mail box, if that method of accepting is a reasonable response to the offer.
