X died one day after the husband Y purchased a life insurance for her with Y as the beneficiary. Y was prosecuted for murder. The prosecutor planned to present the insurance policy as evidence to prove that Y had a motive t kill his wife. Would the court allow it?

A. Yes, because the insurance has a tendency to show that Y had a motive to kill X.

B. No, because the probative value of the insurance is substantially outweighed by the dangers of unfair prejudice.

C. Yes, because the jury would be at better position to make the judgment.

D. No, because the insurance is irrelevant to this case.

【答案与解析】