During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court sustained the objection, the reasons would be the following But ( ).

A. The testimony was hearsay not within any exception.

B. The testimony was intended to prove that the defendant was not the robber.

C. The testimony presented an out-of-court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein.

D. The testimony was intended to prove defendant’s then -existing state of mind.

 

【答案与解析】

给TA打赏
共{{data.count}}人
人已打赏
法律英语

During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court overruled the objection, which would be the most probable reason?

2022-7-4 11:12:06

法律英语

In a murder trial, the prosecutor planned to call the defendant's attorney to testify that the defendant had admitted to him that he did kill the victim. The court will ( ).

2022-12-19 15:43:13

0 条回复 A文章作者 M管理员
    暂无讨论,说说你的看法吧
个人中心
购物车
优惠劵
今日签到
有新私信 私信列表
搜索