文章
文章用户商铺快讯星球问答

A gave a ride to his friend B and hit a pedestrian C. C sued A for personal injury and planned to use in court B’s diary that he wrote about the accident two days after the accident. The opponent objected. Which of the following is true? ( )

A. The diary was hearsay and not admissible.

B. The diary was excluded from hearsay and thus admissible.

C. The diary was within one of the exceptions to hearsay and admissible.

D. The diary was not hearsay and was admissible.

 

【答案与解析】

推荐阅读：

  1. During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court overruled the objection, which would be the most probable reason?
  2. During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court sustained the objection, the reasons would be the following But ( ).
  3. Verdict
  4. A finder at common law has a claim of the property found as against all the world save the true owner if （ ）.

给TA打赏
共{{data.count}}人
人已打赏
LEC2013年11月真题传闻证据例外规则
法律英语

In a murder trial, the prosecutor planned to call the defendant's attorney to testify that the defendant had admitted to him that he did kill the victim. The court will ( ).

2022-12-19 15:43:13

法律英语

A state law was enacted in January 2013 prohibiting unauthorized copying of published books and makes it a crime. P, a professor at a college who made a few copies of a book for his students in June 2012 was prosecuted. What constitutional provision would be most helpful to P's defense? ( ).

2022-12-27 14:25:21

猜你喜欢

Verdict

1217
0 条回复 A文章作者 M管理员
    暂无讨论，说说你的看法吧
❯

解锁会员权限

开通会员

解锁海量优质VIP资源

立刻开通
个人中心
购物车
优惠劵
今日签到
有新私信 私信列表
搜索

  • 扫码打开当前页

返回顶部