During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court overruled the objection, which would be the most probable reason?

A. The testimony was not hearsay.

B. The testimony fell within a hearsay exception: present sense impression.

C. The testimony fell within a hearsay exception: then-existing state of mind.

D. The testimony was intended to prove that the defendant was not the robber.

 

【答案与解析】

给TA打赏
共{{data.count}}人
人已打赏
法律英语

X died one day after the husband Y purchased a life insurance for her with Y as the beneficiary. Y was prosecuted for murder. The prosecutor planned to present the insurance policy as evidence to prove that Y had a motive t kill his wife. Would the court allow it?

2022-7-4 11:01:44

法律英语

During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court sustained the objection, the reasons would be the following But ( ).

2022-7-4 11:22:44

0 条回复 A文章作者 M管理员
    暂无讨论,说说你的看法吧
个人中心
购物车
优惠劵
今日签到
有新私信 私信列表
搜索