-
A gave a ride to his friend B and hit a pedestrian C. C sued A for personal injury and planned to use in court B’s diary that he wrote about the accident two days after the accident. The opponent objected. Which of the following is true? ( )
A. The diary was hearsay and not admissible. B. The diary was excluded from hearsay and thus admissible. C. The diary was within one of the exceptions to hearsay and admissible. D. The diary was not h…- 85
- 0
-
During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court sustained the objection, the reasons would be the following But ( ).
A. The testimony was hearsay not within any exception. B. The testimony was intended to prove that the defendant was not the robber. C. The testimony presented an out-of-court statement offered in cou…- 76
- 0
-
During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court overruled the objection, which would be the most probable reason?
A. The testimony was not hearsay. B. The testimony fell within a hearsay exception: present sense impression. C. The testimony fell within a hearsay exception: then-existing state of mind. D. The test…- 96
- 0
-
￥优惠劵使用时效：无法使用使用时效：
之前
使用时效：永久有效优惠劵ID：×