-
隐藏支付积分
隐藏支付积分Declaration of Independence
A. A declaration made in 1689 to proclaim the rights of British subjects. B. In French history, a declaration made in 1789 to enumerate the "natural, inalienable and sacred rights of man." C…...- 1
- 1
- 171
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
Writ of certiorari
A. A writ of the court ordering the sheriff to seize or hold a debtor's property and bring the property before the court. B. A judicial order that a judgment be enforced. C. A writ to compel perf…...- 1
- 1
- 220
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
A lawyer paid by the country to defend one who is indigent (without funds).
A. Public prossecutor B. Public defender C. Prosecuting attorney D. Probation officer 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 1
- 157
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
A term used to describe legal services provided to client free of charge.
A. Nisi prius B. Prima facie C. Mens rea D. Pro bono 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 1
- 136
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
Power of attorney
A. A written instrument appointing and authorizing a person to act in the place of another agent or substitute. B. The chief law officer of the federal government or of each state government. C. The a…...- 0
- 1
- 140
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
A common law doctrine providing that an acceptance made in response to an offer is valid and forms a binding contract at the time of its dispatch, as when it is placed in the mail box, if that method of accepting is a reasonable response to the offer.
A. First-in-Time Rule B. Mailing Rule C. Business Judgement Rule D. Mailbox Rule 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 1
- 117
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
Standard of review
A. justification used by judges to explain politically-compelled decisions. B. The original jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court. C. The results of an annual judicial conference held to review the f…...- 0
- 1
- 168
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
X died one day after the husband Y purchased a life insurance for her with Y as the beneficiary. Y was prosecuted for murder. The prosecutor planned to present the insurance policy as evidence to prove that Y had a motive t kill his wife. Would the court allow it?
A. Yes, because the insurance has a tendency to show that Y had a motive to kill X. B. No, because the probative value of the insurance is substantially outweighed by the dangers of unfair prejudice. …...- 0
- 0
- 77
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
It has been a commonly held belief that an owner may not be divested of his properties without his intent to do so; but the “voidable rule” allows this to happen when （ ）。
A. a thief steals it from his possession. B. a good-faith purchaser purchases it from the thief. C. he accidentally drops it in a public place. D. he places it in the hand of someone who deals in the …...- 0
- 0
- 43
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
A bought a car from dealer B and had an accident because of the defect of the car. If A sues B, what would be the most likely result?
A. A will not win unless he can prove that B was negligence. B. A will not win unless he can prove that B was negligence and without defenses. C. A will not win because B was not the manufacturer. D. …...- 0
- 0
- 104
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court overruled the objection, which would be the most probable reason?
A. The testimony was not hearsay. B. The testimony fell within a hearsay exception: present sense impression. C. The testimony fell within a hearsay exception: then-existing state of mind. D. The test…...- 0
- 0
- 96
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
Which of the following transfers would create the largest estate under the common law?（ ）
A. To A for life, then to A's heirs. B. To B and the heirs of his body. C. To C for as long as the Sun goes up and the River runs. D. To D as fee simple absolute. 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 0
- 26
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
C is an employee of D Co.. One day, when transporting goods for D Co., C negligently hit a pedestrian E. If E sued D Co. and won, the most probable reason would be the following BUT
A. D Co. was the principal of C. B. D Co. was vicariously liable. C. D Co. signed an employment contract with C. D. C did not have money to pay damages. 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 0
- 120
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
During a trial for robbery, the defense lawyer called a witness to testify that two days before the robbery, the defendant told him that he was going to visit his relatives in another city. The prosecutor objected on the ground of hearsay. If the court sustained the objection, the reasons would be the following But ( ).
A. The testimony was hearsay not within any exception. B. The testimony was intended to prove that the defendant was not the robber. C. The testimony presented an out-of-court statement offered in cou…...- 0
- 0
- 76
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
In a car accident, G was injured and sued H and J for negligence. The rule of joint and several liability was adopted by the court and the damage of G was determined at $10,000 in total. Suppose the jury found G was 30% liable, while H and J each was 35% liable, which of the following statements is NOT true?
A. G may only collect $7,000 from H. B. G may only collect $7,000 from J. C. G may only collect $3,500 from H. D. G may collect $3,500 from H, and $3,500 from J. 【答案与解析】...- 1
- 0
- 124
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
In a murder trial, the prosecutor planned to call the defendant’s attorney to testify that the defendant had admitted to him that he did kill the victim. The court will ( ).
A. allow it because it would prove the case. B. allow it because the defendant had destroyed all other evidence. C. not allow it because this conversation is privileged. D. not allow it because the at…...- 0
- 0
- 81
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
K was injured by a car and lied on the walkway bleeding. L passed by and saw K, but he did not stop. Later K died because of bleeding and K’s personal representative sued L. If the court held for K, it would be because
A. L was K's husband. B. L was a passer-by. C. L was a nurse on his way to work. D. L was a court clerk. 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 0
- 193
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
A gave a ride to his friend B and hit a pedestrian C. C sued A for personal injury and planned to use in court B’s diary that he wrote about the accident two days after the accident. The opponent objected. Which of the following is true? ( )
A. The diary was hearsay and not admissible. B. The diary was excluded from hearsay and thus admissible. C. The diary was within one of the exceptions to hearsay and admissible. D. The diary was not h…...- 0
- 0
- 85
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
K was injured by a car and lied on the walkway bleeding. L passed by and saw K, but he did not stop. Later K died because of bleeding and K’s personal representative sued L. If the court held for L, it would be because
A. L did not know K and did not cause the accident. B. L did not know how to help. C. L would not be paid by K. D. L did not injure K. 【答案与解析】 ...- 0
- 0
- 73
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
A state law was enacted in January 2013 prohibiting unauthorized copying of published books and makes it a crime. P, a professor at a college who made a few copies of a book for his students in June 2012 was prosecuted. What constitutional provision would be most helpful to P’s defense? ( ).
A. The ex post facto clause. B. The commercial clause. C. The due process clause. D. The enforcement clause. 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 0
- 59
-
隐藏支付积分隐藏支付积分
S badly needed cash and offered to sell an antique that was a gift from his grandparents. B, an owner of an antique shop, offered to buy it at $ 1,000 and S agreed. Before delivering the antique to B, S discovered that the market price of the antique was actually $ 10,000. He decided not to sell it to B. If B sues S for breach of contract, which of the following is the best defense that S may allege?
A. B was in bad faith. B. The contract was unconscionable. C. There was no consideration. D. The contract was formed by undue influence. 【答案与解析】...- 0
- 0
- 65
-
￥优惠劵使用时效：无法使用使用时效：
之前
使用时效：永久有效优惠劵ID：×